The Alliance for Democratic Accountability–Ghana (ADAM-GH) has invoked the jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, seeking a compelling interpretation of Article 66, clauses one and two, of the 1992 Constitution concerning presidential term limits.
The group says the move is necessary to safeguard Ghana’s constitutional democracy and prevent what it describes as growing public speculation and misinterpretation of the law.
According to ADAM-GH, Article 66(1) and (2) of the Constitution, which outline the tenure and re-election limits of the President, must be clearly interpreted by the Supreme Court to remove any ambiguity regarding eligibility for presidential office.
The group argues that public commentary and political debates surrounding a possible third-term presidency risk undermining constitutional order if not properly addressed through judicial interpretation.
In a statement issued today, ADAM-GH emphasized that constitutional matters of this nature fall exclusively within the interpretative authority of the Supreme Court, as provided under Article 130 of the Constitution.
ADAM-GH cautioned that once the matter is formally before the Supreme Court, any public commentary or political pronouncement on the subject could amount to contempt of court.
The group says it will not hesitate to draw the court’s attention to any individual or organization that attempts to prejudge or influence the case through public discourse.
Article 66 of the 1992 Constitution limits a President to two terms in office. However, recent political discussions have renewed debate over its interpretation, prompting ADAM-GH’s legal action.
The group insists that the Supreme Court’s ruling will bring finality to the matter and reinforce respect for constitutional governance.
ADAM-GH says it remains committed to defending Ghana’s democracy and urges all stakeholders to allow the court process to take its course.
We will keep you updated as the Supreme Court takes steps to hear the case.
Source: myxyzonline.com
