Mahama pledges lean, highly efficient government to curb expenditure

The NDC flagbearer, John Mahama, has reiterated his commitment to drastically reduce the size of government if he becomes president.

In one of his Mahama Conversations with the media in Accra on Sunday, Mahama criticised the Akufo-Addo government for having bloated appointees of ministers and deputy ministers.

This the former President says has led to economic mismanagement.

For his part, Mr Mahama said, “I will run a lean, highly effective, and efficient government of no more than 60 ministers and deputy ministers”.

He stressed that this promise demonstrates his genuine commitment to curbing government expenditure.

“My leaner government will be the cleanest government Ghana has ever experienced. It will serve Ghanaians far better and set higher standards for future governments. What we have now can never be and should never be a yardstick,” he stated.

Mr Mahama also stated his goal to launch a renewed fight against corruption.

“I will keep my appointees in check, and Ghanaians can be assured that drastic steps will be taken to punish the corrupt officials and their accomplices in this present government.

“No actor in this NPP corruption enterprise will be spared. We will also take action to repossess what has been unlawfully stolen from the Ghanaian people,” he added.

The NDC leader’s commitment to a leaner government and stricter anti-corruption measures aims to restore trust in public office and ensure better governance for all Ghanaians.

He said his next government will “set up an independent value-for-money office to scrutinise all government procurements above a $5 million threshold or as shall be recommended by Parliament.”

 

Source: Myjoyonline.com

Corruption fight: No actor in this NPP corruption enterprise will be spared – Mahama

Former President John Mahama has reiterated his commitment to tackling corruption impartially when he returns to power.

The flag bearer of the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC) believes corruption has been normalized under the current Akufo-Addo government and stifled development in the country.

Addressing journalists on Sunday night in Accra, the former President emphasized his unwavering commitment to retrieving state resources that had been plundered by persons wielding power in the current regime.

He noted that he will no longer adopt a lenient stance when it comes to dealing with corrupt activities.

“I can assure you, if you believe that I was imbued the father-for-all syndrome, it’s been exorcised. And it’s been exorcised because it is a demand by the people of Ghana.”

Mahama said his goal is to launch a renewed fight against corruption and keep his appointees in check.

“Ghanaians can be assured that drastic steps will be taken to punish the corrupt officials and their accomplices in this present government.”

“No actor in this NPP corruption enterprise will be spared,” he assured and stated his government will also “take action to repossess what has been unlawfully stolen from the Ghanaian people.”

“As we all know, government procurement is a significant source of corruption. No economy can sustain inclusive and equitable social and economic well-being with the penchant for public service holders to be self-serving and corrupt, as is currently the case, ” he added.

Mahama also pledged that under his regime, the use of public finances will always be compliant with national laws, transparent, justified by contemporary value-for-money tests, and solely in the interest of the broader citizens.

“If we want to eliminate corruption, we must increase accountability in government procurement processes,” he stated.

Accountability, he noted, “gives power back to the people.”

Mahama went on to assure the people of Ghana that the NDC government under his leadership will fully be committed to
accountability.

 

By Henryson Okrah| Myxyzonline.com

No father-for-all approach in my fight against corruption – Mahama assures

The flag bearer of the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC), former President John Dramani Mahama has pledged to tackle corruption allegations head-on and impartially when re-elected to office.

The opposition leader vowed to investigate all culprits, appointees of the current Akufo-Addo administration, and hold them accountable without any protection or favoritism.

Addressing journalists in Accra on Sunday during one of his interactions dubbed ‘Mahama Conversations’, Mr. Mahama stated that his style of governance would be different especially in tackling corruption in the country.

He noted that he will no longer adopt a lenient stance when it comes to dealing with corrupt activities.

“I can assure you, if you believe that I was imbued the father-for-all syndrome, it’s been exorcised. And it’s been exorcised because it is a demand by the people of Ghana.”

Mahama, who decried the levels of corruption among government officials, indicated that his position on anti-graft had been highly influenced by the people.

“The people of Ghana are asking for accountability and we must create a situation where everybody who agrees to serve must know that he will be held accountable to the people,” he said.

The former President also recounted efforts made during his administration to recover funds from state agencies.

“We retrieved monies from state agencies, so the track record is there,” he asserted.

He reflected on his previous tenure as President, citing the controversial GYEEDA (Ghana Youth Employment and Entrepreneurial Development Agency) report as evidence of his dedication to combating corruption.

“Some of the people involved [in GYEEDA case] went to court to restrain the Attorney General and the court processes took forever. There were others where there was the prosecution of my own colleague and friend, Abuga Pele. The Attorney General put him before courts and he was jailed. It was recently that President Akufo-Addo granted him amnesty,” he added. “So the will to fight corruption was there.”

He also assured that stolen state resources under the current regime will be traced and retrieved while culprits are made to face the law.

“No actor in this NPP corruption enterprise will be spared,” he added and warned that his appointees will be checked thoroughly.

 

Source: Myxyzonline.com

 

Keep NAPO’s public speeches scripted – KNUST’s Adu Gyamfi warns

A Political Historian from the Political Science Department at the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST), Professor Samuel Adu Gyamfi, has advised the New Patriotic Party (NPP) to ensure that Dr. Matthew Opoku Prempeh, the party’s running mate, refrains from making unscripted public utterances and speeches.

According to Prof. Adu Gyamfi, this recommendation is due to NAPO’s strong personality, which may become overly apparent in public settings.

In an interview on Eyewitness News on Thursday, July 4, Prof. Adu Gyamfi emphasised that while Dr. Opoku Prempeh brings a wealth of experience to the Bawumia ticket, it is crucial for the party, especially his handlers, to ensure that he does not speak extemporaneously in public.

“I am of the view that in terms of public engagement when he is to deliver a speech or on a campaign platform, I will suggest that he does not speak extempore, and further, as I appeal, he should not speak off the cuff.

“I am of the view that the political handlers, marketers, and experts in speeches and those who are going to write those speeches for him must prepare him with a lower tone because he has a strong personality and charisma to be able to communicate with a party voice and in a way to also be quite humane.

“So, his speech should have a tone that is polite, respectful, cuts across, and has a certain soberness within the sphere,” he stated.

On Thursday, July 4, the National Executive Council of the NPP unanimously endorsed Bawumia’s nomination of Dr. Matthew Opoku Prempeh, also known as NAPO, as his running mate for the 2024 general elections in December.

 

Source: Citinews

School feeding caterers threaten strike over GH₵1.20 per child payment instead of GH₵1.50

The Ashanti Regional branch of a group known as the Progressive School Feeding Caterers Association Ghana is threatening to lay down their tools over reductions in payment of the approved school feeding grant and non-payment of arrears.

In a statement, the association said authorities in charge of the programme have failed to pay them the actual feeding grant of GH₵ 1.50 per pupil.

They claim to have been shortchanged by the secretariat as they were paid 30 pesewas less than the approved amount.

Caterers across the country persistently demanded that the government increase the school feeding grant from the original GH₵ 1 per child to GH₵ 3, owing to food price hikes.

Following several protests by the caterers, the government consequently agreed to increase the amount.

According to the association, the Coordinator of the School Feeding Programme, Hajia Safia, revealed on national television that the government had approved a GH₵ 1.50 feeding fee per child for the 2023/2024 academic year.

“However, we the caterers realised from recent payment that GH₵ 1.20 was used for the calculation instead of the GH₵1.50 approved by the government,” portions of the statement read.

The association led by its President, Gifty Asamoah is demanding that the government ensure the payment of 30 pesewas difference.

The group is also urging the government to settle arrears for the second term of the academic year by the end of July 12, 2024.

They are also requesting the payment of the third-term feeding grant before the beginning of the next academic year.

The group also raised concerns about delays in termly payment, underpayment, underpayment due to non-cooking, and demand for tax certificates.

They are threatening to withdraw their services if the government and the School Feeding Secretariat fail to heed their demands.

 

Source: Myjoyonline.com

GUTA calls for immediate withdrawal of 5% excise tax on plastic manufacturing companies

The Ghana Union of Traders Association (GUTA) has demanded the immediate withdrawal of the 5% Excise Tax imposed on plastic manufacturing companies to prevent their collapse.

In a press release on Wednesday, July 3, the Union’s Secretary General, Alpha Shaban, stated, “We do not want to believe government is being insensitive to the plight of the business community and Ghanaians as well by imposing such a tax on plastic manufacturers in the country.”

GUTA is particularly concerned about the tax being introduced at a “time of instability of the cedi, coupled with increasing utility tariffs and other numerous taxes that the business community is grappling with.”

The Union questioned the economic rationale of such a policy when the government is purportedly promoting an industrialisation agenda and calling for import substitution.

They argue that imposing “such obnoxious tax on local manufacturing companies” will “collapse businesses which are already suffocating as a result of unbearable taxes in the system.”

The Union emphasised that the business community “can no longer accept any additional layer of cost to doing business in the country, so we appeal to the government to, as a matter of urgency, stop the implementation of the 5% excise tax to alleviate hardship in the country.”

 

Source: Joy Business

Chief Justice dismisses petition for OSP’s removal

The Chief Justice, Gertrude Sackey Torkornoo has dismissed the petition allegedly forwarded by the former Special Prosecutor, Martin Amidu that sought to remove his successor, Kissi Agyebeng from office.

According to Joy News sources, the Chief Justice determined that the factual and legal foundation of the petition fall short of the standard required to establish a prima facie case for the removal of the special prosecutor

The petition, dated April 30, 2024, was reportedly sent to the President by Mr Amidu and conveyed to Justice Gertrude Torkonoo on May 6, 2024.

Mr Amidu alleged procurement breaches in the purchase of vehicles for the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) and abuses involving judges and the administration of justice.

Other allegations include violations of citizens’ rights through arrests and detentions, violations of the right to information, and improper appointments of personnel to the office.

Mr Amidu also claimed that by arresting individuals such as Cecilia Dapaah and Prof Frimpong Boateng, the Special Prosecutor abused his office.

Meanwhile, in a piece circulating online and purported to have been written by Mr Martin Amidu, he’s seen criticising the conclusion reached by the Chief Justice on the matter.

He stated that, “I have today received a one-page letter from the Presidency with reference number OSP 307/24/659 dated 2 July 2024 notifying me that: “…. the Honourable Chief Justice, Mrs. Justice Gertrude Sackey Torkornoo, has submitted her review of the existence or absence of a prima facie case with respect to your petition.” I was then informed that: “In accordance with section 15 (3) of the Office of the Special Prosecutor Act, 2017, the Chief Justice determined that the factual and legal foundation of the petition fall short of the standard required to establish a prima facie case for the removal of the Special Prosecutor.”

He added that “I was not given a copy of the “review of the existence or absence of a prima facie case” submitted by the Chief Justice leading to her determination with respect to my petition to aid the accountability and transparency of the outcome. The outcome of the petition was not mine to make, and I ought not normally to have any regrets whatsoever about any outcome made in accordance with the taught traditions of the exercise of judicial discretion, in which a determination is made by the Chief Justice that my petition disclosed no prima facie case for the Special Prosecutor to answer. ”

 

Source: Myjoyonline.com

Akufo-Addo’s plot to pack Supreme Court with NPP-inclined Judges unconstitutional – NDC

The General Secretary of the opposition National Democratic Congress (NDC), Franklyn Fifi Kwetey, has condemned President Nana Akufo-Addo for secretly planning to appoint some politically-inclined Judges to the Supreme Court.

The opposition party’s resistance comes after the Chief Justice, Justice Gertrude Torkonoo, recommended some five judges to President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo for nomination to the Supreme Court.

Addressing the media at the NDC Headquarters on Thursday, July 4, Mr Kwetey described the proposal as unconstitutional and stated that the constitution does not mandate the Chief Justice to recommend individuals to the President for nomination as Supreme Court judges.

“Nowhere in the constitution is the Chief Justice named as the one to recommend persons to the president for appointment to the Supreme Court. We wish to state, without any equivocation, that the Chief Justice’s letter is illegal and of no effect.

“Her actions have completely turned over due process on its head and compromised her independence as the head of the judicial system. We are concerned about a worrying pattern that irresistibly suggests that the president is only appointing loyal members of his party to this court to have control over the judiciary to escape post-regime accountability,” he stated.

The names recommended for nomination to the Supreme Court include Justice Afia Serwaa Asare Botchwey, the presiding judge in the ambulance case involving Minority Leader Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson, as well as Justice Cyra Pamela Koranteng, Justice Edward Amoako Asante, Justice Eric Kyei Baffuour, and Justice Angelina Mensah Homiah.

Below is the press statement;

PRESS CONFERENCE ADDRESSED BY FIFI FIAVI KWETEY, GENERAL SECRETARY OF THE NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS (NDC) ON EXPOSING PRESIDENT AKUFO-ADDO’S UNHOLY AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL PLOT TO PACK THE SUPREME COURT OF GHANA WITH ADDITIONAL FIVE (5) JUDGES
THURSDAY, 4TH JULY 2024.

 

1. Ladies and gentlemen of the press, thank you for honoring our invitation. Today, we gather not just as members of the media, but as defenders of democracy, guardians of
justice, and voices for the voiceless.

2. Our beloved country stands at a critical crossroads. The very pillars of our democracy are under siege by an administration that has shown a blatant disregard for the rule of
law and the sanctity of our independent institutions. And it is our moral duty to defend it.

We must unite under a common cause to fight to preserve the integrity of our judiciary and the very soul of our democracy.

3. Ladies and Gentlemen, it will shock you to know that President Akufo-Addo, who has already packed the Supreme Court with an unprecedented 15 appointments, is now
conspiring with Chief Justice Gertrude Araba Esaba Torkonoo to add five more judges to our highest court. This isn’t just a political maneuver of an already exiting failed President;
it’s an assault on our democracy, a betrayal of public trust, and a direct threat to the integrity of our judicial system.

4. Imagine the dire consequences of this reckless action. This government stops at nothing and is determined to create a judiciary that is no longer a check on executive power, but
a mere extension of it. This is not the Ghana our forefathers fought for; this is not the democracy we pledged to uphold. Our nation deserves better, and it is our duty to stand up and protect the very foundations of our democratic society

5. Despite the huge number of judges appointed by President Akufo-Addo to the Superior and lower Courts and the 15 judges that he has already appointed to the Supreme Court
in particular, the NDC has become aware of a grand conspiracy hatched by President Akufo-Addo and the Chief Justice, Gertrude Araba Esaba Torkonoo to appoint additional
five judges to the Supreme Court.

6. We have sighted a shocking and deeply disturbing letter from Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo to President Akufo-Addo, requesting the appointment of five new judges to the
Supreme Court of Ghana.

7. This request from the Chief Justice is not only a blatant violation of our Constitution but also a flagrant disregard for the established customs and traditions that guide the
nomination of judges to our nation’s highest court.

8. The names of the five judges put forward by the Chief Justice in her unconstitutional, unsolicited, and self-serving request to the President include Her Ladyship Justice
Angelina Mensah Homiah, His Lordship Justice Eric Kyei Baffour, His Lordship Justice Edward Amoako Asante, Her Ladyship Justice Cyra Pamela C.A Koranteng, and Her
Ladyship Justice Afia Asare Botwe, the judge currently presiding over the persecution of Hon. Minority Leader, Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson.

9. It is instructive to note that this brazen, unsolicited request from the Chief Justice, dated 30th May 2024, was promptly received by President Akufo-Addo on 4th June 2024.

10. Subsequent to that, the Attorney-General, who is also the chief persecutor of the Minority Leader in the court of Justice Afia Asare Botwe, brazenly followed with another
letter dated 21st June 2024, expressing support for the Chief Justice’s unsolicited and unconstitutional request.

11. With the President, the Chief Justice and the Attorney-General in agreement, and in furtherance of the President’s grand agenda to pack the courts and annex the judiciary as
an extension of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), an emergency Judicial Council meeting was hurriedly convened on 24th June, 2024 by the Chief Justice who is also the chair of the
Judicial Council.

12. At the said meeting, the Chief Justice who on the face of the records initiated the unsolicited request for the additional five justices to be appointed to the Supreme Court,
presented the Attorney-General’s letter of 21st June, 2024 to make a case to the Council for these appointments. Interestingly at that meeting, the Chief Justice remained
completely silent about her own unconstitutional and self-serving request to the President.

13. Our unimpeachable sources tell us that the Judicial Council however unanimously stood against the reckless schemes of both the President and the Chief Justice. We are
further informed that all the members of the Judicial Council rejected the proposal, citing poor and dangerous timing, especially with general elections only six months away.

14. Members of the Judicial Council insisted that the next government be given the opportunity to consider the arguments for the expansion in the number of Supreme Court
Justices, if at all necessary.

15. Ladies and Gentlemen, we have in our possession a letter signed by the President of the Ghana Bar Association, Yaw Acheampong Boafo esquire, dated 29th April, 2024 and
addressed to President Akufo-Addo.

16. In this letter, the Ghana Bar Association objected to the clandestine approach by President Akufo-Addo to appoint five additional judges to Ghana’s Supreme Court, thereby
increasing the number of judges on the Supreme Court to 20. President Akufo-Addo with the connivance of the Chief Justice, had sought to hide his attempt to further pack the
Supreme Court, under the guise of a proposal for a minimum ceiling of 20 judges on Ghana’s Supreme Court bench.

17. The GBA’s disagreement, which we find well-grounded and well-reasoned, is premised on the fact that the President’s proposal should have come in the form of a proposed
amendment of Article 128(1) of the 1992 Constitution, to set a new ceiling for the number of judges on the Supreme Court, which currently consists of the Chief Justice and a
minimum of nine other Justices.

18. The GBA argued forcefully that the request by President Akufo-Addo and Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo to increase the minimum number of Justices of the Supreme Court to
20 will lead to the circumvention of the required constitutional amendments, hence their rejection of same.

19. The GBA proposed a review of the conventional number of Justices of the Supreme Court every ten years, calling for broader consultations with other key stakeholders such
as the Council of State and Parliament.

20. From the foregoing, it is clear that the Chief Justice sought to put forward the names of these judges as though they were being proposed by the Attorney-General on behalf of
President Akufo-Addo.

21. We are completely shocked and scandalized by the extent to which the Hon. Chief Justice was prepared to consciously side-step due process and even breach the
constitution just to please the President and aid him execute his unholy agenda to pack the Supreme Court.

22. It is for good reason that Article 144(2) of the 1992 Constitution enjoins the President to make such appointments to the Supreme Court on the advice of the Judicial Council,
in consultation with the Council of State, and subject to parliamentary approval.

23. In the wisdom of the framers of the Constitution, this consultative process is designed to protect the independence of the judiciary.

24. Contrary to this constitutional imperative, the Chief Justice singularly constituted herself into the Judicial Council and unilaterally acted in its name and on its behalf.

25. By electing to write to President Akufo-Addo, requesting for these appointments and seeking a post-facto ratification from the Judicial Council, the Chief Justice sought to turn
the Council into a mere rubberstamp.

26. Nowhere in the Constitution is the Chief Justice named as the one to recommend persons to the President for appointment to the Supreme Court.

27. We wish to state without any equivocation that the Chief Justice’s letter is illegal and of no effect. Her actions have completely turned due process on its head and compromised
her independence as the head of the judiciary.

28. We are concerned about a worrying pattern which irresistibly suggests that the President is appointing only loyalists of his party to these courts to have control of the
judiciary and escape post-regime accountability.

29. It is also very clear that the President is packing the courts ahead of the impending presidential and parliamentary elections with judges who are sympathetic to his party.

30. Such deliberate politicization and bastardization of independent institutions of state, including the judiciary, can negatively impact the peace and stability of our democracy.

31. It is trite knowledge that without a fair and impartial judiciary, democracy and constitutionalism suffer. That is why this must be an issue of huge national concern as it adds to the many other issues that already pose threats to the peace and stability of Ghana’s democracy.

32. Already, President Akufo-Addo has appointed as many as 15 judges to the Supreme Court of Ghana, since 2017. This exceeds the seven appointments made to the Supreme Court by  both President John Evans Atta Mills and President John Mahama over the eight years preceding 2017; President Mills appointed three judges to the Supreme Court while President Mahama appointed four justices to the apex court.

33. If President Akufo-Addo and the Chief Justice are not restrained in their unholy alliance to appoint five additional judges to the Supreme Court, it will bring to 20 the number of judges appointed by President Akufo-Addo alone to the Supreme Court.

34. While the Constitution of Ghana does not put a cap on the number of judges to be appointed to the Supreme Court, it is very clear that the framers had operated on a reasonable assumption that all Presidents would be mindful of endless appointments to the apex court and its consequences. The framers of the constitution clearly did not contemplate an Akufo-Addo presidency where the apex court is packed with loyalists of the President and his party.

35. With general elections set to take place in a few months, we are of the view that President Akufo-Addo must immediately halt his plans to make any further appointments to the superior courts. This is in view of the fact that he has already packed the courts with too many of his loyalists to the disbelief of many right-thinking Ghanaians and
consummate democrats.

36. Again, there are enough judges on the bench at this particular point in time to deal with judicial issues.

37. More importantly, with elections on the horizon, it is fair that any such appointment with far-reaching implications on this constitutional democracy should be left for the next President of Ghana.

38. After all, President Akufo-Addo abdicated his position as President a very long time ago when he said that the next President will fix the economic mess that he and vice President
Alhaji Bawumia have created.

39. The President must be reminded that such lopsided appointments, particularly to the judiciary, is a big factor in the widely held perception of a politically biased and hostile judiciary in the administration of justice at the apex court, especially in matters involving the NDC.

40. President Akufo-Addo must therefore take a cue and desist from any further appointments to the Supreme Court at this time in order to help de-escalate the perception of bias on the part of judiciary.

41. The latest maneuvering between the Chief Justice and the President adds to a series of happenings in the Judiciary that paint a picture of bias and imbalance. Further packing
of the courts will do very little to restore trust and confidence in the Judiciary which is at an all-time low.

42. It can, in fact, fuel legitimate concern that it is being done to ensure the presence of an overwhelming number of Judges sympathetic to the current regime who could be called
upon to shield members of this government from scrutiny and frustrate any future efforts at exacting accountability from them when they leave power.

43. The NDC finds the retort by the Chief Justice that the latest abortive appointments were necessary because of the load of cases, completely untenable.

44. Furthermore, we have noted a trend of very speedy promotion of relatively newly minted Judges over and above their more experienced seniors at the Bench. This undermines the
spirit of meritocracy which is essential for proper administration of Justice and holds the potential to pressurize such Judges into delivering rulings that may catch the eye of the
appointing authority.

45. Also, the unexplained transfers of some Judges, in the immediate aftermath of their Judgements in high-profile political cases raises eyebrows. The impression created from this is that Judges who do not conform to some expectation of the Chief Justice and the President would receive subtle retribution cloaked in administrative processes, for their troubles.

46. Democratic governance requires that certain standards are met within all arms of government. At no point must independent institutions of state be joined at the hip with
the executive to further its interests.

47. Friends from the media, the current posturing of the Chief Justice and her involvement in the nomination of more Judges to the Supreme Court, do not inspire confidence that
the Judiciary is sufficiently independent from the Akufo-Addo/Bawumia administration.

48. Again, the naked abuse of power by President Akufo-Addo and his over-zealous desire to control all arms of government poses a grave danger to our democracy and governance
arrangements. President Akufo-Addo must note that the ongoing happenings in Kenya serve as a reminder that there is a tolerable limit for the abuse and excesses of the
Executive.

To Conclude, we are calling on all Ghanaians to rise up against this tyranny. We must protect our democracy, our judiciary, and our future. The actions of President Akufo-Addo
and his cohorts are not just political games; they are existential threats to the very fabric of our nation. It is time to stand up, speak out, and demand justice.

The NDC urgently demands the following actions:
1. Immediate Halt further Supreme Court Appointments

We demand that President Akufo-Addo immediately stop any plans to appoint additional judges to the Supreme Court. This reckless action is not just a political maneuver; it is an outrageous assault on our democracy and a betrayal of the public trust. Imagine the anger and disbelief as we watch our judiciary being transformed into a puppet of the executive, eroding the very checks and balances that protect our freedom.

2. Adherence to Constitutional Processes

We demand that any future appointments to the Supreme Court must strictly follow the constitutional process, including consultation with the Judicial Council. This blatant disregard for established procedures is not only unconstitutional but also morally reprehensible. It’s a slap in the face to every Ghanaian who believes in the rule of law and the sanctity of our democratic institutions.

3. Transparency and Accountability

We call for the full disclosure of the criteria and process used for the selection of these judges. This is essential to ensure transparency and accountability. The clandestine and backdoor dealings to appoint loyalists are a disgrace. This hidden agenda fuels public distrust and fosters a culture of corruption that undermines the integrity of our judiciary.

4. Judicial Independence

We call on the Chief Justice to uphold the independence of the judiciary by resisting any pressure from the executive to influence judicial appointments.
The judiciary is the last bastion of justice, and its independence is sacrosanct. By compromising this independence, the NPP is not just bending the law; they are breaking the backbone of our democracy.

5. Immediate Reversal of the Unconstitutional Appointment Request

We demand that the Chief Justice retract the unconstitutional request to appoint additional judges and ensure future actions align with legal and ethical standards. This brazen overreach into the judicial realm is an unforgivable breach of trust. It’s time to reverse these illegal actions and restore faith in our judicial system.

6. Public and Civil Society Engagement

The government must engage with civil society, legal professionals, and the public to discuss and review the process of judicial appointments to restore trust and ensure fairness. The voice of the people must be heard. The current administration’s attempts to silence dissent and operate in the shadows are a direct threat to our democratic principles.

7. Ensuring Merit-Based Appointments
Future judicial appointments must be based on merit, experience, and integrity, rather than political affiliations or loyalties. This is not just about filling seats; it’s about ensuring justice for all Ghanaians. The NPP’s nepotism and cronyism are creating a judiciary that serves only their interests, not those of the people.

8. Protection of Judicial Officers

Safeguards must be established to protect judges from political influence and retribution, ensuring they can perform their duties without fear of repercussions. Our judges must be free to uphold the law without fearing for their careers or lives. The NPP’s tactics of intimidation and coercion must be stopped to preserve the sanctity of our judiciary.

Ladies and Gentlemen, our beloved nation stands at a precipice. Our democracy, painstakingly built by the sacrifices of our forefathers, is under a grave threat from those who have sworn to uphold it. The blatant, unconstitutional actions of President Akufo- Addo and Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo are not just political maneuvers—they are a direct assault on our judicial independence and the very soul of our democracy.

Imagine a Ghana where the judiciary, becomes a mere extension of a failed executive—a tool for political retribution rather than justice. This is not the Ghana we pledged to uphold;
this is not the Ghana we want to pass down to our children.

We cannot, and we must not, remain silent. Our silence will only embolden those who seek to undermine our democratic institutions. We must rise with one voice, loud and clear, to defend our judiciary, to protect our democracy, and to preserve the integrity of our nation. Let every Ghanaian—young and old, men and women, from every corner of our land— stand up against this travesty and brazen attempt to hijack our judiciary.

Civil society, the clergy, and all democracy-loving citizens must join hands in this fight. This is not just about political affiliations; this is about the future of our nation. Let us
show the world that Ghanaians will not stand for tyranny, corruption, and the erosion of
our democratic values.

Let us fight with every breath to ensure that justice prevails, that our institutions remain independent, and that our democracy remains strong. For the sake of our children, for the
sake of our future, let us unite and demand accountability. Let us rise and reclaim our nation from the grips of those who seek to destroy it.
This is our Ghana. This is our democracy. And we will defend it with every fiber of our being.

Thank you.
FIFI FIAVI KWETEY
GENERAL SECRETARY

Ghana is like hell today because of Akufo-Addo’s incompetence – NDC’s Atta Kusi

The National Democratic Congress (NDC) Constituency Secretary for Sunyani East has tagged President Nana Akufo-Addo as the most insensitive head of state Ghana has ever had, citing his mismanagement of the country’s economy.

Mr Atta Kusi who was speaking on Power FM‘s Battleground programme on Wednesday night argued that Ghana was better of under the leadership of John Mahama before he was voted out by Ghanaians for Akufo-Addo.

Touching on the skyrocketing prices of goods and services coupled with numerous taxes that are crippling businesses in the country, the NDC man explained that the country was heading in a wrong direction despite the many promises of Akufo-Addo and his ministers to fix the country’s challenges.

He noted that since assuming office in January 2017, Akufo-Addo has showcased his cluelessness in good governance, leaving the citizens with bad governance riddled with unrestrained corruption among top officials who have nothing to offer.

He told host oheneba Boamah Bennie that Ghana’s woes are a result of the insensitivity of Akufo-Addo and his top appointees who he alleged had put themselves and families first to the detriment of the suffering tax payers who put them in office to serve with dignity.

“The NPP today is full of corrupt and evil people… If you go to every sector of the economy, the level of thievery and pilfering are scary and we the citizens are the ones suffering for their the arrogant and profligate lifestyle of these non performing appointees,” Kusi stated.

“Just imagine the hardship the people are going through all because someone who is paid and cushioned to steer the affairs of the  country is underperfoming.”

“Today, about 194,000 people have completed junior high school but did not have access to secondary education because their parents were not financially strong to foot the initial bills under the free SHS policy yet millions of dollars have been pumped into the national cathedral which remains a hole till now,” he recounted while urging Ghanaians to reject the New Patriotic Party (NPP) led by Vice President Dr Mahamudu Bawumia as its flag bearer.

Mr Kusi went on to say that, “If I were a member of the NPP, I would always cover my head in shame all because of Akufo-Addo and Bawumia’s incompetence.”

“Corruption has been normalised under this government to a point that 12 million dollars meant for the Pwalugu irrigation project cannot be accounted for yet they are telling us to allow them govern us again. They think Ghanaians are fools,” he posited.

“People are losing their capital due to the depreciation of the cedi against major trading currencies How much is the price of cement today?  A bag of cement was about 18 cedis in 2016 but it is 125 cedis in Sunyani currently,” he said while reminding Ghanaians of the many promises of improving the lives of Ghanaians by Akufo-Addo.

“They promised stable fuel prices but Ghanaians cannot buy fuel today. We have to reject these thieves who have captured everything that belongs to the state and return the NDC and former president John Mahama to government to put Ghana on the right path,” Kusi urged.

 

Source: Myxyzonline.com

[Full Text] Fifi Kwetey’s press conference on Akufo-Addo’s intention to appoint more Judges to Supreme Court

PRESS CONFERENCE ADDRESSED BY FIFI FIAVI KWETEY, GENERAL SECRETARY OF THE NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS (NDC) ON EXPOSING PRESIDENT AKUFO-ADDO’S UNHOLY AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL PLOT TO PACK THE SUPREME COURT OF GHANA WITH ADDITIONAL FIVE (5) JUDGES
THURSDAY, 4TH JULY 2024.

 

1. Ladies and gentlemen of the press, thank you for honoring our invitation. Today, we gather not just as members of the media, but as defenders of democracy, guardians of
justice, and voices for the voiceless.

2. Our beloved country stands at a critical crossroads. The very pillars of our democracy are under siege by an administration that has shown a blatant disregard for the rule of
law and the sanctity of our independent institutions. And it is our moral duty to defend it.

We must unite under a common cause to fight to preserve the integrity of our judiciary and the very soul of our democracy.

3. Ladies and Gentlemen, it will shock you to know that President Akufo-Addo, who has already packed the Supreme Court with an unprecedented 15 appointments, is now
conspiring with Chief Justice Gertrude Araba Esaba Torkonoo to add five more judges to our highest court. This isn’t just a political maneuver of an already exiting failed President;
it’s an assault on our democracy, a betrayal of public trust, and a direct threat to the integrity of our judicial system.

4. Imagine the dire consequences of this reckless action. This government stops at nothing and is determined to create a judiciary that is no longer a check on executive power, but
a mere extension of it. This is not the Ghana our forefathers fought for; this is not the democracy we pledged to uphold. Our nation deserves better, and it is our duty to stand up and protect the very foundations of our democratic society

5. Despite the huge number of judges appointed by President Akufo-Addo to the Superior and lower Courts and the 15 judges that he has already appointed to the Supreme Court
in particular, the NDC has become aware of a grand conspiracy hatched by President Akufo-Addo and the Chief Justice, Gertrude Araba Esaba Torkonoo to appoint additional
five judges to the Supreme Court.

6. We have sighted a shocking and deeply disturbing letter from Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo to President Akufo-Addo, requesting the appointment of five new judges to the
Supreme Court of Ghana.

7. This request from the Chief Justice is not only a blatant violation of our Constitution but also a flagrant disregard for the established customs and traditions that guide the
nomination of judges to our nation’s highest court.

8. The names of the five judges put forward by the Chief Justice in her unconstitutional, unsolicited, and self-serving request to the President include Her Ladyship Justice
Angelina Mensah Homiah, His Lordship Justice Eric Kyei Baffour, His Lordship Justice Edward Amoako Asante, Her Ladyship Justice Cyra Pamela C.A Koranteng, and Her
Ladyship Justice Afia Asare Botwe, the judge currently presiding over the persecution of Hon. Minority Leader, Dr. Cassiel Ato Forson.

9. It is instructive to note that this brazen, unsolicited request from the Chief Justice, dated 30th May 2024, was promptly received by President Akufo-Addo on 4th June 2024.

10. Subsequent to that, the Attorney-General, who is also the chief persecutor of the Minority Leader in the court of Justice Afia Asare Botwe, brazenly followed with another
letter dated 21st June 2024, expressing support for the Chief Justice’s unsolicited and unconstitutional request.

11. With the President, the Chief Justice and the Attorney-General in agreement, and in furtherance of the President’s grand agenda to pack the courts and annex the judiciary as
an extension of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), an emergency Judicial Council meeting was hurriedly convened on 24th June, 2024 by the Chief Justice who is also the chair of the
Judicial Council.

12. At the said meeting, the Chief Justice who on the face of the records initiated the unsolicited request for the additional five justices to be appointed to the Supreme Court,
presented the Attorney-General’s letter of 21st June, 2024 to make a case to the Council for these appointments. Interestingly at that meeting, the Chief Justice remained
completely silent about her own unconstitutional and self-serving request to the President.

13. Our unimpeachable sources tell us that the Judicial Council however unanimously stood against the reckless schemes of both the President and the Chief Justice. We are
further informed that all the members of the Judicial Council rejected the proposal, citing poor and dangerous timing, especially with general elections only six months away.

14. Members of the Judicial Council insisted that the next government be given the opportunity to consider the arguments for the expansion in the number of Supreme Court
Justices, if at all necessary.

15. Ladies and Gentlemen, we have in our possession a letter signed by the President of the Ghana Bar Association, Yaw Acheampong Boafo esquire, dated 29th April, 2024 and
addressed to President Akufo-Addo.

16. In this letter, the Ghana Bar Association objected to the clandestine approach by President Akufo-Addo to appoint five additional judges to Ghana’s Supreme Court, thereby
increasing the number of judges on the Supreme Court to 20. President Akufo-Addo with the connivance of the Chief Justice, had sought to hide his attempt to further pack the
Supreme Court, under the guise of a proposal for a minimum ceiling of 20 judges on Ghana’s Supreme Court bench.

17. The GBA’s disagreement, which we find well-grounded and well-reasoned, is premised on the fact that the President’s proposal should have come in the form of a proposed
amendment of Article 128(1) of the 1992 Constitution, to set a new ceiling for the number of judges on the Supreme Court, which currently consists of the Chief Justice and a
minimum of nine other Justices.

18. The GBA argued forcefully that the request by President Akufo-Addo and Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo to increase the minimum number of Justices of the Supreme Court to
20 will lead to the circumvention of the required constitutional amendments, hence their rejection of same.

19. The GBA proposed a review of the conventional number of Justices of the Supreme Court every ten years, calling for broader consultations with other key stakeholders such
as the Council of State and Parliament.

20. From the foregoing, it is clear that the Chief Justice sought to put forward the names of these judges as though they were being proposed by the Attorney-General on behalf of
President Akufo-Addo.

21. We are completely shocked and scandalized by the extent to which the Hon. Chief Justice was prepared to consciously side-step due process and even breach the
constitution just to please the President and aid him execute his unholy agenda to pack the Supreme Court.

22. It is for good reason that Article 144(2) of the 1992 Constitution enjoins the President to make such appointments to the Supreme Court on the advice of the Judicial Council,
in consultation with the Council of State, and subject to parliamentary approval.

23. In the wisdom of the framers of the Constitution, this consultative process is designed to protect the independence of the judiciary.

24. Contrary to this constitutional imperative, the Chief Justice singularly constituted herself into the Judicial Council and unilaterally acted in its name and on its behalf.

25. By electing to write to President Akufo-Addo, requesting for these appointments and seeking a post-facto ratification from the Judicial Council, the Chief Justice sought to turn
the Council into a mere rubberstamp.

26. Nowhere in the Constitution is the Chief Justice named as the one to recommend persons to the President for appointment to the Supreme Court.

27. We wish to state without any equivocation that the Chief Justice’s letter is illegal and of no effect. Her actions have completely turned due process on its head and compromised
her independence as the head of the judiciary.

28. We are concerned about a worrying pattern which irresistibly suggests that the President is appointing only loyalists of his party to these courts to have control of the
judiciary and escape post-regime accountability.

29. It is also very clear that the President is packing the courts ahead of the impending presidential and parliamentary elections with judges who are sympathetic to his party.

30. Such deliberate politicization and bastardization of independent institutions of state, including the judiciary, can negatively impact the peace and stability of our democracy.

31. It is trite knowledge that without a fair and impartial judiciary, democracy and constitutionalism suffer. That is why this must be an issue of huge national concern as it adds to the many other issues that already pose threats to the peace and stability of Ghana’s democracy.

32. Already, President Akufo-Addo has appointed as many as 15 judges to the Supreme Court of Ghana, since 2017. This exceeds the seven appointments made to the Supreme Court by  both President John Evans Atta Mills and President John Mahama over the eight years preceding 2017; President Mills appointed three judges to the Supreme Court while President Mahama appointed four justices to the apex court.

33. If President Akufo-Addo and the Chief Justice are not restrained in their unholy alliance to appoint five additional judges to the Supreme Court, it will bring to 20 the number of judges appointed by President Akufo-Addo alone to the Supreme Court.

34. While the Constitution of Ghana does not put a cap on the number of judges to be appointed to the Supreme Court, it is very clear that the framers had operated on a reasonable assumption that all Presidents would be mindful of endless appointments to the apex court and its consequences. The framers of the constitution clearly did not contemplate an Akufo-Addo presidency where the apex court is packed with loyalists of the President and his party.

35. With general elections set to take place in a few months, we are of the view that President Akufo-Addo must immediately halt his plans to make any further appointments to the superior courts. This is in view of the fact that he has already packed the courts with too many of his loyalists to the disbelief of many right-thinking Ghanaians and
consummate democrats.

36. Again, there are enough judges on the bench at this particular point in time to deal with judicial issues.

37. More importantly, with elections on the horizon, it is fair that any such appointment with far-reaching implications on this constitutional democracy should be left for the next President of Ghana.

38. After all, President Akufo-Addo abdicated his position as President a very long time ago when he said that the next President will fix the economic mess that he and vice President
Alhaji Bawumia have created.

39. The President must be reminded that such lopsided appointments, particularly to the judiciary, is a big factor in the widely held perception of a politically biased and hostile judiciary in the administration of justice at the apex court, especially in matters involving the NDC.

40. President Akufo-Addo must therefore take a cue and desist from any further appointments to the Supreme Court at this time in order to help de-escalate the perception of bias on the part of judiciary.

41. The latest maneuvering between the Chief Justice and the President adds to a series of happenings in the Judiciary that paint a picture of bias and imbalance. Further packing
of the courts will do very little to restore trust and confidence in the Judiciary which is at an all-time low.

42. It can, in fact, fuel legitimate concern that it is being done to ensure the presence of an overwhelming number of Judges sympathetic to the current regime who could be called
upon to shield members of this government from scrutiny and frustrate any future efforts at exacting accountability from them when they leave power.

43. The NDC finds the retort by the Chief Justice that the latest abortive appointments were necessary because of the load of cases, completely untenable.

44. Furthermore, we have noted a trend of very speedy promotion of relatively newly minted Judges over and above their more experienced seniors at the Bench. This undermines the
spirit of meritocracy which is essential for proper administration of Justice and holds the potential to pressurize such Judges into delivering rulings that may catch the eye of the
appointing authority.

45. Also, the unexplained transfers of some Judges, in the immediate aftermath of their Judgements in high-profile political cases raises eyebrows. The impression created from this is that Judges who do not conform to some expectation of the Chief Justice and the President would receive subtle retribution cloaked in administrative processes, for their troubles.

46. Democratic governance requires that certain standards are met within all arms of government. At no point must independent institutions of state be joined at the hip with
the executive to further its interests.

47. Friends from the media, the current posturing of the Chief Justice and her involvement in the nomination of more Judges to the Supreme Court, do not inspire confidence that
the Judiciary is sufficiently independent from the Akufo-Addo/Bawumia administration.

48. Again, the naked abuse of power by President Akufo-Addo and his over-zealous desire to control all arms of government poses a grave danger to our democracy and governance
arrangements. President Akufo-Addo must note that the ongoing happenings in Kenya serve as a reminder that there is a tolerable limit for the abuse and excesses of the
Executive.

To Conclude, we are calling on all Ghanaians to rise up against this tyranny. We must protect our democracy, our judiciary, and our future. The actions of President Akufo-Addo
and his cohorts are not just political games; they are existential threats to the very fabric of our nation. It is time to stand up, speak out, and demand justice.

The NDC urgently demands the following actions:
1. Immediate Halt further Supreme Court Appointments

We demand that President Akufo-Addo immediately stop any plans to appoint additional judges to the Supreme Court. This reckless action is not just a political maneuver; it is an outrageous assault on our democracy and a betrayal of the public trust. Imagine the anger and disbelief as we watch our judiciary being transformed into a puppet of the executive, eroding the very checks and balances that protect our freedom.

2. Adherence to Constitutional Processes

We demand that any future appointments to the Supreme Court must strictly follow the constitutional process, including consultation with the Judicial Council. This blatant disregard for established procedures is not only unconstitutional but also morally reprehensible. It’s a slap in the face to every Ghanaian who believes in the rule of law and the sanctity of our democratic institutions.

3. Transparency and Accountability

We call for the full disclosure of the criteria and process used for the selection of these judges. This is essential to ensure transparency and accountability. The clandestine and backdoor dealings to appoint loyalists are a disgrace. This hidden agenda fuels public distrust and fosters a culture of corruption that undermines the integrity of our judiciary.

4. Judicial Independence

We call on the Chief Justice to uphold the independence of the judiciary by resisting any pressure from the executive to influence judicial appointments.
The judiciary is the last bastion of justice, and its independence is sacrosanct. By compromising this independence, the NPP is not just bending the law; they are breaking the backbone of our democracy.

5. Immediate Reversal of the Unconstitutional Appointment Request

We demand that the Chief Justice retract the unconstitutional request to appoint additional judges and ensure future actions align with legal and ethical standards. This brazen overreach into the judicial realm is an unforgivable breach of trust. It’s time to reverse these illegal actions and restore faith in our judicial system.

6. Public and Civil Society Engagement

The government must engage with civil society, legal professionals, and the public to discuss and review the process of judicial appointments to restore trust and ensure fairness. The voice of the people must be heard. The current administration’s attempts to silence dissent and operate in the shadows are a direct threat to our democratic principles.

7. Ensuring Merit-Based Appointments
Future judicial appointments must be based on merit, experience, and integrity, rather than political affiliations or loyalties. This is not just about filling seats; it’s about ensuring justice for all Ghanaians. The NPP’s nepotism and cronyism are creating a judiciary that serves only their interests, not those of the people.

8. Protection of Judicial Officers

Safeguards must be established to protect judges from political influence and retribution, ensuring they can perform their duties without fear of repercussions. Our judges must be free to uphold the law without fearing for their careers or lives. The NPP’s tactics of intimidation and coercion must be stopped to preserve the sanctity of our judiciary.

Ladies and Gentlemen, our beloved nation stands at a precipice. Our democracy, painstakingly built by the sacrifices of our forefathers, is under a grave threat from those who have sworn to uphold it. The blatant, unconstitutional actions of President Akufo- Addo and Chief Justice Gertrude Torkonoo are not just political maneuvers—they are a direct assault on our judicial independence and the very soul of our democracy.

Imagine a Ghana where the judiciary, becomes a mere extension of a failed executive—a tool for political retribution rather than justice. This is not the Ghana we pledged to uphold;
this is not the Ghana we want to pass down to our children.

We cannot, and we must not, remain silent. Our silence will only embolden those who seek to undermine our democratic institutions. We must rise with one voice, loud and clear, to defend our judiciary, to protect our democracy, and to preserve the integrity of our nation. Let every Ghanaian—young and old, men and women, from every corner of our land— stand up against this travesty and brazen attempt to hijack our judiciary.

Civil society, the clergy, and all democracy-loving citizens must join hands in this fight. This is not just about political affiliations; this is about the future of our nation. Let us
show the world that Ghanaians will not stand for tyranny, corruption, and the erosion of
our democratic values.

Let us fight with every breath to ensure that justice prevails, that our institutions remain independent, and that our democracy remains strong. For the sake of our children, for the
sake of our future, let us unite and demand accountability. Let us rise and reclaim our nation from the grips of those who seek to destroy it.
This is our Ghana. This is our democracy. And we will defend it with every fiber of our being.

Thank you.
FIFI FIAVI KWETEY
GENERAL SECRETARY

Mid-year budget must address our demands – Investment Holders Forum

The Locked-Up Investment Holders Forum has urged the Finance Ministry to include provisions in the Mid-Year Budget Review to address issues with insolvent financial institutions and ensure the payment of dividends to investors whose funds are currently locked up.

Speaking during a demonstration on Wednesday, July 3rd, the forum’s convener, Dr Adu Anane Antwi, called on the government to allocate funds in the budget review for the release of depositors’ locked-up funds in insolvent financial institutions.

He referenced the Bank of Ghana’s commitment to revoke licences and pay depositors once resources are made available.

“We want to see a provision made in the budget to cover the specialised institutions that have now become insolvent…so we are saying the government through the Ministry of Finance should make financial provisions in this Mid-year review so that the Bank of Ghana can revoke these licences and pay depositors our locked-up funds.”

Dr Adu Anane also cautioned against prioritising the recapitalization of the National Investment Bank (NIB) over other crucial financial commitments, suggesting that the allocated amount of GHS 2.7 billion is excessive and could be reduced to GHS 1 billion, with additional funding provided in the next year.

“I’m pleading with a government that the 2.7 billion that it budgeted for NIB is too much, given the circumstances that we find ourselves now when people are dying, they don’t have the money.

“NIB, under the Banking Act, needs a minimum capitalisation of 400 million. If you give them 1 billion, they have gone over the minimum capital and they can operate soundly. The next year, you can top up regularly, but not today.”

 

Source: Citinewsroom.com

NAPO not competent to be running mate in Ghana – Basintale

Malik Basintale, the Deputy Communications Officer for the National Democratic Congress (NDC), says Energy Minister Dr Matthew Opoku Prempeh known popularly as Napo is not a suitable candidate to be Dr Mahamudu Bawumia’s running mate.

Dr Bawumia has announced his choice of running mate to President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo, the majority caucus, and the New Patriotic Party (NPP).

In an interview with Selorm Adonoo on Point Blank on Eyewitness News on Citi FM on Wednesday, Basintale stated that the Energy Minister does not have the necessary competencies to be a running mate.

According to Basintable, the former Education Minister has a bad track record and is noted for his arrogance.

“[Napo] is a very bad candidate…He has a very bad track record…He was the same person who came to take us back to dumsor and today lights go off recklessly here and there. Same man.”

“So people know the man Napo. People know how arrogant he is, people know how confrontational, how he lacks the temperament, how he lacks the competencies to fit in the space of being a running mate,” he stated.

 

Source: Citinewsroom.com